Re: FAA shutdown on Oct 1?

[Tarver Engineering]

"Lucifer" > wrote in message
...
> http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0903/091603a1.htm
>
> Legislation introduced in the Senate on Tuesday would extend airport
> construction and security funding for half a year, allowing lawmakers
> time to rethink a compromise version of the 2003 Federal Aviation
> Administration reauthorization bill that leaves some air traffic
> controllers vulnerable to job competitions.
>
> Sen. John Rockefeller, D-W.Va., introduced the temporary FAA
> reauthorization legislation so that Congress would not feel rushed to
> pass the permanent four-year, $60 billion reauthorization bill before
> Oct. 1, when funding for key aviation projects runs out
>
>
> Bush to veto FAA reauthorization bill?

Likely.

> http://washingtontimes.com/business/20030916-093539-8359r.htm
>
> Senate Democrats yesterday proposed an alternative to a Bush
> administration plan to privatize air-traffic control at an additional
> 69 regional airports.
> They want to keep Federal Aviation Administration air-traffic
> controllers on the government payroll instead of turning their jobs
> over to private companies.
> Included on the list of control towers that would be privatized
> are airports in Manassas and Newport News in Virginia.
> "You do not fool with the air- transportation system," said Sen.
> John D. Rockefeller IV, West Virginia Democrat.

Like Reagan?

Maneta (D) is promising "massive layoffs", as the alternative.

[Frank Linquest]

I believe AvWeb reported that the rockefeller bill was expected, and was
pretty much rumored to be pronounced 'dead on arrival'. It will be
interesting to see what really happens.

BTW: The biggest fight here....The contract towers have in fact saved
millions and have not been dangerous.

Frank

Tarver Engineering wrote:

> "Lucifer" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0903/091603a1.htm
>>
>>Legislation introduced in the Senate on Tuesday would extend airport
>>construction and security funding for half a year, allowing lawmakers
>>time to rethink a compromise version of the 2003 Federal Aviation
>>Administration reauthorization bill that leaves some air traffic
>>controllers vulnerable to job competitions.
>>
>>Sen. John Rockefeller, D-W.Va., introduced the temporary FAA
>>reauthorization legislation so that Congress would not feel rushed to
>>pass the permanent four-year, $60 billion reauthorization bill before
>>Oct. 1, when funding for key aviation projects runs out
>>
>>
>>Bush to veto FAA reauthorization bill?
>
>
> Likely.
>
>
>>http://washingtontimes.com/business/20030916-093539-8359r.htm
>>
>>Senate Democrats yesterday proposed an alternative to a Bush
>>administration plan to privatize air-traffic control at an additional
>>69 regional airports.
>> They want to keep Federal Aviation Administration air-traffic
>>controllers on the government payroll instead of turning their jobs
>>over to private companies.
>> Included on the list of control towers that would be privatized
>>are airports in Manassas and Newport News in Virginia.
>> "You do not fool with the air- transportation system," said Sen.
>>John D. Rockefeller IV, West Virginia Democrat.
>
>
> Like Reagan?
>
> Maneta (D) is promising "massive layoffs", as the alternative.
>
>

[Tarver Engineering]

"Frank Linquest" > wrote in message
...
> I believe AvWeb reported that the rockefeller bill was expected, and was
> pretty much rumored to be pronounced 'dead on arrival'. It will be
> interesting to see what really happens.

Rockefeller is a man who bought an office and certainly should go sit down.

> BTW: The biggest fight here....The contract towers have in fact saved
> millions and have not been dangerous.

Yes and if the NAATC blocks the budget, there will be hell for their members
to pay.

> Frank
>
> Tarver Engineering wrote:
>
> > "Lucifer" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >>http://www.govexec.com/dailyfed/0903/091603a1.htm
> >>
> >>Legislation introduced in the Senate on Tuesday would extend airport
> >>construction and security funding for half a year, allowing lawmakers
> >>time to rethink a compromise version of the 2003 Federal Aviation
> >>Administration reauthorization bill that leaves some air traffic
> >>controllers vulnerable to job competitions.
> >>
> >>Sen. John Rockefeller, D-W.Va., introduced the temporary FAA
> >>reauthorization legislation so that Congress would not feel rushed to
> >>pass the permanent four-year, $60 billion reauthorization bill before
> >>Oct. 1, when funding for key aviation projects runs out
> >>
> >>
> >>Bush to veto FAA reauthorization bill?
> >
> >
> > Likely.
> >
> >
> >>http://washingtontimes.com/business/20030916-093539-8359r.htm
> >>
> >>Senate Democrats yesterday proposed an alternative to a Bush
> >>administration plan to privatize air-traffic control at an additional
> >>69 regional airports.
> >> They want to keep Federal Aviation Administration air-traffic
> >>controllers on the government payroll instead of turning their jobs
> >>over to private companies.
> >> Included on the list of control towers that would be privatized
> >>are airports in Manassas and Newport News in Virginia.
> >> "You do not fool with the air- transportation system," said Sen.
> >>John D. Rockefeller IV, West Virginia Democrat.
> >
> >
> > Like Reagan?
> >
> > Maneta (D) is promising "massive layoffs", as the alternative.
> >
> >
>

[Bertie the Bunyip]

"Tarver Engineering" > wrote in
:

>
> "Frank Linquest" > wrote in message
> ...
>> I believe AvWeb reported that the rockefeller bill was expected, and
>> was pretty much rumored to be pronounced 'dead on arrival'. It will
>> be interesting to see what really happens.
>
> Rockefeller is a man who bought an office and certainly should go sit
> down.
>
>> BTW: The biggest fight here....The contract towers have in fact
>> saved millions and have not been dangerous.
>
> Yes and if the NAATC blocks the budget, there will be hell for their
> members to pay.

Is there anything you know anything about at all, splaps boy?


Bertie

[Bàidh Stidean]

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 04:08:41 GMT, Bertie the Bunyip >
wrote:

>"Tarver Engineering" > wrote in
:
>
>>
>> "Frank Linquest" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> I believe AvWeb reported that the rockefeller bill was expected, and
>>> was pretty much rumored to be pronounced 'dead on arrival'. It will
>>> be interesting to see what really happens.
>>
>> Rockefeller is a man who bought an office and certainly should go sit
>> down.
>>
>>> BTW: The biggest fight here....The contract towers have in fact
>>> saved millions and have not been dangerous.
>>
>> Yes and if the NAATC blocks the budget, there will be hell for their
>> members to pay.
>
>Is there anything you know anything about at all, splaps boy?

Sex with rodents?

[Bertie the Bunyip]

Bàidh Stidean > wrote in
:

> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 04:08:41 GMT, Bertie the Bunyip >
> wrote:
>
>>"Tarver Engineering" > wrote in
:
>>
>>>
>>> "Frank Linquest" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> I believe AvWeb reported that the rockefeller bill was expected, and
>>>> was pretty much rumored to be pronounced 'dead on arrival'. It will
>>>> be interesting to see what really happens.
>>>
>>> Rockefeller is a man who bought an office and certainly should go sit
>>> down.
>>>
>>>> BTW: The biggest fight here....The contract towers have in fact
>>>> saved millions and have not been dangerous.
>>>
>>> Yes and if the NAATC blocks the budget, there will be hell for their
>>> members to pay.
>>
>>Is there anything you know anything about at all, splaps boy?
>
> Sex with rodents?
>

Please, I've just eaten!

Bertie

[Phil Miller]

On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 01:59:56 -0500, Bàidh Stidean
> wrote:

>On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 04:08:41 GMT, Bertie the Bunyip >
>wrote:
>
>>Is there anything you know anything about at all, splaps boy?
>
>Sex with rodents?

Jet powered TBM-3R Avengers?


Phil
--
Great Tarverisms #1

> The Air Speed Indicator (ASI) shows

You made that up, didn't you?

The IAS indicator says IAS, not ASI.

Why do you come here pretending to know something
when you don't even know the words?

John

[Thomas Mosher]

Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
> "Tarver Engineering" > wrote in
> :
>
>
>>"Frank Linquest" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>>I believe AvWeb reported that the rockefeller bill was expected, and
>>>was pretty much rumored to be pronounced 'dead on arrival'. It will
>>>be interesting to see what really happens.
>>
>>Rockefeller is a man who bought an office and certainly should go sit
>>down.
>>
>>
>>>BTW: The biggest fight here....The contract towers have in fact
>>>saved millions and have not been dangerous.
>>
>>Yes and if the NAATC blocks the budget, there will be hell for their
>>members to pay.
>
>
> Is there anything you know anything about at all, splaps boy?
>
>
> Bertie
The North American Association of Teachers of Czech (NAATC) is going to
block the FAA budget?

Try National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA).

Jesus, can't get anything right can he?

Tom

[Bertie the Bunyip]

Thomas Mosher > wrote in
:

> Bertie the Bunyip wrote:
>> "Tarver Engineering" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>
>>>"Frank Linquest" > wrote in message
...
>>>
>>>>I believe AvWeb reported that the rockefeller bill was expected, and
>>>>was pretty much rumored to be pronounced 'dead on arrival'. It will
>>>>be interesting to see what really happens.
>>>
>>>Rockefeller is a man who bought an office and certainly should go sit
>>>down.
>>>
>>>
>>>>BTW: The biggest fight here....The contract towers have in fact
>>>>saved millions and have not been dangerous.
>>>
>>>Yes and if the NAATC blocks the budget, there will be hell for their
>>>members to pay.
>>
>>
>> Is there anything you know anything about at all, splaps boy?
>>
>>
>> Bertie
> The North American Association of Teachers of Czech (NAATC) is going to
> block the FAA budget?
>
> Try National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA).
>
> Jesus, can't get anything right can he?
>
> Tom

Seems to be as constant as the northern star.

Bertie

[running with scissors]

Bertie the Bunyip > wrote in message m>...
> "Tarver Engineering" > wrote in
> :
>
> >
> > "Frank Linquest" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >> I believe AvWeb reported that the rockefeller bill was expected, and
> >> was pretty much rumored to be pronounced 'dead on arrival'. It will
> >> be interesting to see what really happens.
> >
> > Rockefeller is a man who bought an office and certainly should go sit
> > down.
> >
> >> BTW: The biggest fight here....The contract towers have in fact
> >> saved millions and have not been dangerous.
> >
> > Yes and if the NAATC blocks the budget, there will be hell for their
> > members to pay.
>
> Is there anything you know anything about at all, splaps boy?
>
>
> Bertie


felching and home brew excluded ?