Charles wrote:

In article om,
Warren wrote:

No, "chew" is still there.

In one paragraph it says "barter", in the next it says "chew."

Why the editor didn't just change it to "barter" to be consistent is a
mystery.

I wrote back to Cruise Critic about the change they made not being
enough. Laura wrote back that she thought the change to "chew" was
sufficient. Unfortunatly that shows ignorance on her part as to what
was wrong to begin with. All I can say is the result reflects badly on
Cruise Critic.

--
Charles

Have you tried complaining on their board, or would they delete
anti-CC comments?

You might point them at this site (if they care):

http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/jew.html

Bill