If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Comcast Mail wrote:
Actually, it is beginning to look like US Airways will be out of bankruptcy by this summer. They've got their wage and operating cost cuts in place, and should be out before United. So I wouldn't worry about them anymore. I wouldn't have said that last week, but the unions have now all agreed to more givebacks. They said the same upon emerging from their Bankrupcy V1.0 and within a yera, they plan had clearny not achieved anything. They were supposed to reveal their real restructuring plan by Feb 15th, but now this has been extended to march 31st (although US Air said they may still be able to release it by Feb 15th). Wages alone don't make a low cost carrier. US Air has had many years of bragging about becoming a low cost carrier without doing much about their operations. They've only now announced that they will concentrate their call centres into one location. That is a good sign. But if they just emerge from bankrupcy without any real changes to the way they opertate, then it is just a matter of time before they go back in bankrupcy. Right now, all they have done is appease creditors with wage cuts. It remains to be seen what they can do to really restructure themselves with what they have. |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
nobody wrote: Comcast Mail wrote: Actually, it is beginning to look like US Airways will be out of bankruptcy by this summer. They've got their wage and operating cost cuts in place, and should be out before United. So I wouldn't worry about them anymore. I wouldn't have said that last week, but the unions have now all agreed to more givebacks. They said the same upon emerging from their Bankrupcy V1.0 and within a yera, they plan had clearny not achieved anything. They were supposed to reveal their real restructuring plan by Feb 15th, but now this has been extended to march 31st (although US Air said they may still be able to release it by Feb 15th). Wages alone don't make a low cost carrier. US Air has had many years of bragging about becoming a low cost carrier without doing much about their operations. They've only now announced that they will concentrate their call centres into one location. That is a good sign. But if they just emerge from bankrupcy without any real changes to the way they opertate, then it is just a matter of time before they go back in bankrupcy. Right now, all they have done is appease creditors with wage cuts. It remains to be seen what they can do to really restructure themselves with what they have. One thing that they have now managed it to significantly extend the timetable for concern. They are now safe for the short term. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
"Frank F. Matthews" wrote in
news nobody wrote: Wages alone don't make a low cost carrier. US Air has had many years of bragging about becoming a low cost carrier without doing much about their operations. They've only now announced that they will concentrate their call centres into one location. That is a good sign. But if they just emerge from bankrupcy without any real changes to the way they opertate, then it is just a matter of time before they go back in bankrupcy. Right now, all they have done is appease creditors with wage cuts. It remains to be seen what they can do to really restructure themselves with what they have. One thing that they have now managed it to significantly extend the timetable for concern. They are now safe for the short term. I agree that they've extended the time table. And I think cutting wages leads to significant cost savings. But I also wonder what the next step is. Their weakened position, scaled-back route structure and poor service do not make me think they can get back significant numbers of business travellers. Also I doubt they will ever be efficient enough to compete on price with WN, Fl, B6, etc. Maybe they still fly a few routes that no one else wants, and can keep that core business, but the result will be a much smaller airline, much smaller than the current scaled-back one. I know I've voted with my dollars. I'm mainly a leisure traveller these days, so I won't represent much profit to any airline, but I can't see myself giving any money to US. There's too much risk of a liquidation, or a service outage by a disgruntled work force. On top of that, the cost cuts they've made do not seem to have translated to price cuts, and I recently did price them on a itenerary for travel in the next few weeks. On the other hand, WN has some beautiful non-stop flights that go right where I want to go, the lowest price, and has a work force that wants to be there, brain-washed or not. --lw-- |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Lee Witten wrote:
I agree that they've extended the time table. And I think cutting wages leads to significant cost savings. But I also wonder what the next step is. Everyone wonders what their next step is. OK, lets assume you enter Bankrupcy V1.0 and during this process, you decide you will become a low cost carrier. So, you look around and make a list of all areas where your current airline is not competitive and announce a plan to fix every item on that list and a new planned route structrure, fare structure etc. US Air emerged from Bankrupcy V1.0 with no real plan to become a LCC and it emerged simplyu because it had gotten financing to allow it to emerge. Without a real restructuring, the airline had to quickly get into Bankrupcy V2.0. And now, it is talking about emerging from V2.0 and still no plan on how it will transform itself into an LCC. Since Bankrupcy V1.0, US Air should have had a plan on what it really wants to become, somethint that works, not something that pleases investors. (For instance, Air Canada buying 100 regional jets pleases investors even though it raises average seat mile costs). If they had had a clear plan of what they wanted to become, they would have then listed specific items they needed from the workers to allow this plan to be implemented (for instance, getting FAs to help cleanup aircraft to lower number of cleaners and reduce turn around time to 30 minutes). This is the core of the problem. But for US Air, this seems to be just an afterthought, some necessary evil, some 500 page report someone has to do to please the judge even though as soon as it emerges from bankrupcy, that report is filed in a rectangular metal container that is emptied every night. The restructuring plan should have been the very first thing US Air did, even before going into Bankrupcy V2.0. Not only would it have been easier to convince employees that more givebacks were important, but it would have shown employees exactly where the management intend to take the airline. In both US Air and United cases, management seem to be totally clueless on how to make the airline ultra efficient and seem to only focus on asking for wage concessions. It is natural that the employees don't think that their management is very competent. or a service outage by a disgruntled work force. On top of that, the cost cuts they've made do not seem to have translated to price cuts, In fairness to the airline industry, the high price of oil plays a big factor in this. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
We have learned our lesson -- I Hope | My Side | USA & Canada | 0 | July 31st, 2004 04:28 PM |
found this intriguing hope you do to.we understnd this is a bit much but it doesn't hurt to read about this sruff | Nielse Hansen | Australia & New Zealand | 0 | June 8th, 2004 12:14 AM |
New Hope, PA was Great!! ---- need Getaway ideas from NY/NJ area | Avian | USA & Canada | 1 | January 5th, 2004 03:29 PM |
I Hope This Isn't True. | CupCaked aka CupCaked | Cruises | 89 | January 3rd, 2004 01:47 AM |
where is it written Haring ( NY artist expression:) hope paradise looks like Chianti | Mario | Europe | 0 | December 12th, 2003 08:44 PM |