A Travel and vacations forum. TravelBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » TravelBanter forum » Travelling Style » Air travel
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Owning vs. charter vs. airlines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #81  
Old April 5th, 2005, 01:24 AM
Matt Barrow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
. net...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Mike Rapoport" wrote in message
. net...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...

"Matt Barrow" wrote in message
...



Walmart has never signed a single $4B deal AFAIK.

The two I mentioned. Wal-Mart was perhaps the first compnay to do

long
term
deals with their vendors, which is why they were able to get

fabulous
deals.

Period. Furthermore I
doubt that *any* supplier has ever lost Walmart as a customer
because
they
could not arrive somewhere at a particular time.


I also forgot to mention all the corporate buyouts that run well over
$4
billion.



Do you think that any of these buyouts or any other $4 transaction

hinged
on
having a corporate jet?


Certainly. Have you ever participated in one? They don't do it my phone
calls and email.


Yes I have and over the phone is how most of it is done.


That's right! We spend days and weeks on the phone before going out and
talking face to face about land, zoning, land use ordnances, contractorsm
sub-contractors...

We do tons of email and fax and FedEx packages seting things up.

Then, we hop in the plane and meet all the parties involved.

Once there is a
conceptual deal, THEN you have the finance people, product people ect

start
getting together. Having people flying around to meet in person usually

is
discovered and the word gets out. Then the stocks go up and the deal

can't
be done. There was a large oil company aquisition that cost over $300MM
more because someone thought it would be secret and clever to hold talks

on
their jets while they were parked next to each other. It didn't take a
genius to figure what was going on


It didn't take a genius to figure out what was going on BEFORE the started
parking jets next to each other (this thing sounds like some goofy
Hollyweird script).

Funny, isn't it, that a few years ago video conferencing and high spped
communications was thought to be the end of flying around and conducting
meetings? Weren't we supposed to telecommute instead of having office space?

Don't even get me started on the "paperless office".

The point isn't (or shouldn't be) that being a bit late is solved by a
business jet. In that you're correct. OTOH, it's not merely a notion that
flying a team out to negotitate and conclude deals face-to-face, with the
"highly compensated employees and executives" is HIGHLY beneficial AFTER a
lot of leg work is completed.


Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO



MOF, John Deakin tells the story of one in his article after making the
transition to the G-IV, and how the business crew prepped for their
meeting
during the flight. http://www.avweb.com/news/columns/185048-1.html

(about
2/3rds down). I rather expect this is the rule more than the exception.

This past week we began our "season" by doing a land buy and then
negotiations with sub-contractors near San Antonio. The entire flight

the
contractor foremen were working up scenarios. We did the whole thing in
one
day and closed a $1.8M deal on two fronts. This is, of course, chicken
feed
compared to the Fortune 50 world.


The fact remains that big deals are not lost due to the lack of a coporate
jet to get people somewhere a few hours earlier..


Which wasn't the point (timing, though that is certainly a MINOR factor).


  #82  
Old April 5th, 2005, 02:32 PM
Alan Street
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article w8s3e.130030$Ze3.41941@attbi_s51, Grumman-581
wrote:

€ "Alan Street" wrote in message
€ ...
€ That would imply about $400 billion a year turnover. According to
€ WalMart's financial statements, their total turnover was $259 billion
€ last year. ( http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=WMT&annual ).

€ Hey Alan... Didn't know that you frequent this group also... What's up? No
€ diving in San Diego this weekend? Up here the water has visibility as bad
€ as New Orleans and it's cold to boot...



Actually, this is cross-posted to rec.travel.air, which I tend to hang
out on (fair amount of business travel, and for a peon like me, never
in the CitationX). But it's interesting to see the difference in
perspectives between the front and back of the plane.

The diving has been good recently, but I've been too busy to get wet.
Hope to change that in a month or two.

Alan
  #83  
Old April 5th, 2005, 02:32 PM
Alan Street
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article w8s3e.130030$Ze3.41941@attbi_s51, Grumman-581
wrote:

€ "Alan Street" wrote in message
€ ...
€ That would imply about $400 billion a year turnover. According to
€ WalMart's financial statements, their total turnover was $259 billion
€ last year. ( http://finance.yahoo.com/q/is?s=WMT&annual ).

€ Hey Alan... Didn't know that you frequent this group also... What's up? No
€ diving in San Diego this weekend? Up here the water has visibility as bad
€ as New Orleans and it's cold to boot...



Actually, this is cross-posted to rec.travel.air, which I tend to hang
out on (fair amount of business travel, and for a peon like me, never
in the CitationX). But it's interesting to see the difference in
perspectives between the front and back of the plane.

The diving has been good recently, but I've been too busy to get wet.
Hope to change that in a month or two.

Alan
  #84  
Old April 6th, 2005, 12:03 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There is also the point that many corporations have policies that
prohibit having more than one or two high level/ key executives on the
same flight, just in case.

Randy

  #85  
Old April 6th, 2005, 12:03 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

There is also the point that many corporations have policies that
prohibit having more than one or two high level/ key executives on the
same flight, just in case.

Randy

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Airline Ticket Consolidators and Bucket Shops FAQ Edward Hasbrouck Backpacking and Budget travel 0 April 17th, 2004 12:28 PM
Airline Ticket Consolidators and Bucket Shops FAQ Edward Hasbrouck Backpacking and Budget travel 0 March 18th, 2004 09:16 AM
Airline Ticket Consolidators and Bucket Shops FAQ Edward Hasbrouck Travel Marketplace 0 March 18th, 2004 09:16 AM
Airline Ticket Consolidators and Bucket Shops FAQ Edward Hasbrouck Backpacking and Budget travel 0 February 16th, 2004 10:03 AM
Airline Ticket Consolidators and Bucket Shops FAQ Edward Hasbrouck Backpacking and Budget travel 0 January 16th, 2004 09:20 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 TravelBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.