|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
January 14th, 2007, 07:44 PM
posted to rec.travel.cruises
|
|||
|
|||
Expedia star ratings
I've noticed a discrepency in how Expedia rates the Tahitian vs. the
Pacific Princess. The Tahitian gets 4 stars while the Pacific gets 5 stars. As best as I can figure out, both of them are sister ships and are the former R3 and R4 of the Renaissance line. We've travelled on the Golden Princess and Voyager of the Seas both of which Expedia rates 4 1/2 star. The 4 1/2 star rating seemed appropriate so therefore we can't figure out why the Tahitian Princess would be rated worse and the Pacific Princess better. Any thoughts? 
|
|
#2
January 15th, 2007, 06:56 AM
posted to rec.travel.cruises
|
|||
|
|||
|
Expedia star ratings
I saw this also.....I usually read user reviews and base my opinions on
those rather than the star system. ---- http://www.moviesitearchive.com Deedee wrote: I've noticed a discrepency in how Expedia rates the Tahitian vs. the Pacific Princess. The Tahitian gets 4 stars while the Pacific gets 5 stars. As best as I can figure out, both of them are sister ships and are the former R3 and R4 of the Renaissance line. We've travelled on the Golden Princess and Voyager of the Seas both of which Expedia rates 4 1/2 star. The 4 1/2 star rating seemed appropriate so therefore we can't figure out why the Tahitian Princess would be rated worse and the Pacific Princess better. Any thoughts?
|
|
#3
January 15th, 2007, 08:21 AM
posted to rec.travel.cruises
|
|||
|
|||
|
Expedia star ratings
On 1/14/2007 2:44 PM Deedee wrote:
I've noticed a discrepency in how Expedia rates the Tahitian vs. the Pacific Princess. The Tahitian gets 4 stars while the Pacific gets 5 stars. As best as I can figure out, both of them are sister ships and are the former R3 and R4 of the Renaissance line. We've travelled on the Golden Princess and Voyager of the Seas both of which Expedia rates 4 1/2 star. The 4 1/2 star rating seemed appropriate so therefore we can't figure out why the Tahitian Princess would be rated worse and the Pacific Princess better. Any thoughts? Perhaps when the people that did the rating where on one ship during a bad week and experienced inferior service? Or maybe one ship did more cruises than an other and was showing more shop wear? -- ____ Brian M. Kochera "Some mistakes are too much fun to only make once!" ____ View My Web Page: http://home.earthlink.net/~brian1951
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Sleeping Bag ratings? | Buck | Backpacking and Budget travel | 0 | May 15th, 2006 04:38 PM |
| Hotel Ratings In Goa, India | Al | Asia | 1 | October 11th, 2005 03:52 PM |
| user ratings for travel agencies | doogie | Air travel | 0 | July 25th, 2005 05:08 PM |
| Rate The Ratings | Chrissy Cruiser | Cruises | 1 | February 15th, 2005 05:28 PM |
| Italy Hotel Ratings | gerald | Europe | 0 | September 11th, 2003 12:08 PM |
Linear Mode
