QF Frequent Flyers - Don't believe Dixon and Jackson

Funny how both G. Dixon (Qantas CEO) and M. Jackson (Qantas Chairwoman) are
going out of their way to assure us that
it is "business as usual" as far as their Frequent Flyer program is
concerned. Note the statements are that loose they could be interpreted as
anything; and in any case they will have no say in what the Macquarie Bank
directs them to do.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"thegoons" wrote in message
.. .
Funny how both G. Dixon (Qantas CEO) and M. Jackson (Qantas Chairwoman)
are going out of their way to assure us that
it is "business as usual" as far as their Frequent Flyer program is
concerned. Note the statements are that loose they could be interpreted as
anything; and in any case they will have no say in what the Macquarie Bank
directs them to do.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


I'd believe both of them,

Geoff, because he's donating his bonus to charity & Marge because she had a
tear in her eye when XBA touched down today.......

"JimM" wrote in message
reenews.net...

"thegoons" wrote in message
.. .
Funny how both G. Dixon (Qantas CEO) and M. Jackson (Qantas Chairwoman)
are going out of their way to assure us that
it is "business as usual" as far as their Frequent Flyer program is
concerned. Note the statements are that loose they could be interpreted
as
anything; and in any case they will have no say in what the Macquarie
Bank
directs them to do.




--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com


I'd believe both of them,

Geoff, because he's donating his bonus to charity & Marge because she had
a tear in her eye when XBA touched down today.......


....how much did QF contribute to XBA being brought back to life?

....and how much was the Federal grant?



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

thegoons wrote:

Funny how both G. Dixon (Qantas CEO) and M. Jackson (Qantas Chairwoman) are
going out of their way to assure us that
it is "business as usual" as far as their Frequent Flyer program is
concerned. Note the statements are that loose they could be interpreted as
anything; and in any case they will have no say in what the Macquarie Bank
directs them to do.

Miss Jackson is the Chairman of Qantas, not a Chairwoman.

Whilst ever they are directors, they have every right to
determine the details of the FF plan. The owners can only unseat
them, not proscribe management detail.

--
Craig

Pity about shareholder votes

"Craig Welch" wrote in message
...
thegoons wrote:

Funny how both G. Dixon (Qantas CEO) and M. Jackson (Qantas Chairwoman)
are going out of their way to assure us that
it is "business as usual" as far as their Frequent Flyer program is
concerned. Note the statements are that loose they could be interpreted
as
anything; and in any case they will have no say in what the Macquarie
Bank
directs them to do.

Miss Jackson is the Chairman of Qantas, not a Chairwoman.

Whilst ever they are directors, they have every right to determine the
details of the FF plan. The owners can only unseat them, not proscribe
management detail.

--
Craig



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Craig Welch" wrote in message
...

Miss Jackson is the Chairman of Qantas, not a Chairwoman.

always did think she was a bit butch.



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Craig Welch" wrote in message
...
thegoons wrote:

Funny how both G. Dixon (Qantas CEO) and M. Jackson (Qantas Chairwoman)
are going out of their way to assure us that
it is "business as usual" as far as their Frequent Flyer program is
concerned. Note the statements are that loose they could be interpreted
as
anything; and in any case they will have no say in what the Macquarie
Bank
directs them to do.

Miss Jackson is the Chairman of Qantas, not a Chairwoman.

Whilst ever they are directors, they have every right to determine the
details of the FF plan. The owners can only unseat them, not proscribe
management detail.

prescribe is the correct spelling



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

"Craig Welch" wrote in message
...
thegoons wrote:

"Craig Welch" wrote in message

Whilst ever they are directors, they have every right to determine the
details of the FF plan. The owners can only unseat them, not proscribe
management detail.

prescribe is the correct spelling

Sigh. Sometimes I don't know why I bother. 'Prescribe' and 'proscribe' are
*different* words.


Indeed they are. And "prescribe" was the correct one in this case.
"Proscribe" makes no sense in the context of your sentence.