If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
" wrote:
suspension for unpaid fines. As far as I know, Quebec has the same arrangements. They may not do anything at the border, but if you get pulled over for something else, and it has apparently happened to you before, they will deal with it. There is a differentiation made between moving fines and other kinds. If this radar detector wasn't considered the equivalent of a moving fine, it is likely the license would not be suspended. When he gets to the border, he'll probably get lucky, but the problem is that the down side if he does could be pretty severe. It doesn't matter if it was a moving violation or not. The suspension is for non-payment of fines, and the reciprocal arrangement includes non-payment of fine. If he is under suspension in any jurisdiction that is a party to the agreement, he is under suspension in all the others. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
:: Jew to live in peace. Should you go to Syria and assist a Jew to live in : peace, the US government will completely ignore the Syrian governments : requests to punish you. :A really silly hypothetical argument that doesn't advance your position at :all. It is the basic point. No, I would have to agree with him that it is a silly comparison. : If the offence is covered by the reciprocal agreement/extradition :treaty, then you are subject to it. It will only be covered if it is illegal in the USA. No. The reciprocal suspension agreements address the types of suspensions that are honoured. Suspensions for non payment of fines are included in the agreement. If the act is not illegal in the US they will completely ignore any requests to extradite anyone for the "crime". No. They will not completely ignore a request for extradition. Once a formal request has been made it has to be processed. If it is determined in the hearing that it is not a crime then the request will be denied. The people in the agencies who apply for extradition are quite aware of the limits of the treaties and the laws in the countries to which they re applying. They are unlikely to make a request if they know it is not illegal there. Bear in mind that the jurisdictions who subscribe to extradition treaties and reciprocal agreements on licence suspension do so because it is in their own interests not to have people stiffing them for fines. It is a two way street and they are quite eager to pursue their end of the deal. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Smith wrote: " wrote: [snip] There is a differentiation made between moving fines and other kinds. If this radar detector wasn't considered the equivalent of a moving fine, it is likely the license would not be suspended. When he gets to the border, he'll probably get lucky, but the problem is that the down side if he does could be pretty severe. It doesn't matter if it was a moving violation or not. The suspension is for non-payment of fines, and the reciprocal arrangement includes non-payment of fine. If he is under suspension in any jurisdiction that is a party to the agreement, he is under suspension in all the others. 'Round these parts ya can't lose yer license for non payment of nonmoving fines, or parking tickets or the like. It can elevate to a felony level, which you can get extradited for. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AM radio reception inside passenger planes? | Some Guy | Air travel | 141 | February 6th, 2005 09:21 PM |
Austerlitz refuses to be a new NATO Radar Base | tile | Europe | 0 | February 9th, 2004 11:45 AM |
Radar confiscated in France | Mike R | Europe | 86 | November 21st, 2003 11:23 AM |