Seeing eye dogs on Princess...should I cancel?

On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:34:27 -0400, Dick Goldhaber wrote:

What Princess and their passengers should be more aware of is that dogs
"mark", and that any time one of the dogs relieves themselves all the other
dogs will migrate to that spot to reclaim it.

Same thing happens when you toss a penny on the floor of the synagogue.

On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 22:34:27 -0400, Dick Goldhaber wrote:

What Princess and their passengers should be more aware of is that dogs
"mark", and that any time one of the dogs relieves themselves all the other
dogs will migrate to that spot to reclaim it.

Same thing happens when you toss a penny on the floor of the synagogue.

The argument regarding people being deathly allergic to dogs doesn't pass the
straight face test folks.

Anyone who is THAT allergic could never be in an airport, a restaurant, go to a
mall or hotel or any other public enclosed place. There would be many stores
and movie theatres that would be off limits. Service and non-service animals
are everywhere. Essentially they could not go to ANY public accomodation
because they would become ill.

Cruise ships are not a great place to be if you have any serious allergies.
There is no way for them to be hypo-allergenic - there are too many people on
board, they go to too many different ports.

The argument regarding people being deathly allergic to dogs doesn't pass the
straight face test folks.

Anyone who is THAT allergic could never be in an airport, a restaurant, go to a
mall or hotel or any other public enclosed place. There would be many stores
and movie theatres that would be off limits. Service and non-service animals
are everywhere. Essentially they could not go to ANY public accomodation
because they would become ill.

Cruise ships are not a great place to be if you have any serious allergies.
There is no way for them to be hypo-allergenic - there are too many people on
board, they go to too many different ports.

The argument regarding people being deathly allergic to dogs doesn't pass the
straight face test folks.

Anyone who is THAT allergic could never be in an airport, a restaurant, go to a
mall or hotel or any other public enclosed place. There would be many stores
and movie theatres that would be off limits. Service and non-service animals
are everywhere. Essentially they could not go to ANY public accomodation
because they would become ill.

Cruise ships are not a great place to be if you have any serious allergies.
There is no way for them to be hypo-allergenic - there are too many people on
board, they go to too many different ports.

On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 2:27:46 PM UTC-4, R&M wrote:
Just was told that on Diamond Princess 10/16 cruise there will be 11
blind peolple with their seeing eye dogs...have been given the option
of cancelling...what does the group think???

a\0a

Are you for real? Why would you cancel? Allergic to dogs? Afraid of dogs?
These guide-dogs are precious and you will not even know they are there.
They don't want to be bothered because they are working.
Go on the cruise and leave well enough alone.

wrote in message
news:4581057.643.1334264250128.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynjm4...

On Tuesday, August 31, 2004 2:27:46 PM UTC-4, R&M wrote:
Just was told that on Diamond Princess 10/16 cruise there will be 11
blind peolple with their seeing eye dogs...have been given the option
of cancelling...what does the group think???

a�a

On Apr 14, 2:36*pm, "Jr." wrote:
Are you for real? *Why would you cancel? *Allergic to dogs? Afraid of dogs?
These guide-dogs are precious and you will not even know they are there.
They don't want to be bothered because they are working.
Go on the cruise and leave well enough alone.

You do know that you are responding to a series of messages, the last
of which was posted 7 years ago?

Deward

On 4/15/2012 2:03 PM, Deward wrote:
On Apr 14, 2:36 pm, wrote:
Are you for real? Why would you cancel? Allergic to dogs? Afraid of dogs?
These guide-dogs are precious and you will not even know they are there.
They don't want to be bothered because they are working.
Go on the cruise and leave well enough alone.

You do know that you are responding to a series of messages, the last
of which was posted 7 years ago?

Deward

Actually, you cut out the piece he replied to, which was just from the
other day, even if it was only "a a". You should have replied to the
first one.

On Apr 15, 7:26*pm, Bill wrote:

Actually, you cut out the piece he replied to, which was just from the
other day, even if it was only "a a". You should have replied to the
first one.

That's because Google Groups, in their infinite wisdom, chose not to
send me the message to which you refer. If I check in "RecGroups" it
IS there.

Sorry.