If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
More on the QM2 rebellion
Aside from a spoiled passenger problem the technical
incident was------ The "nightmare" entailed the cancellation of scheduled stops in St Kitts, Barbados and Salvador de Bahia in Brazil. This followed a close-encounter with a sea wall in Florida - a collision which damaged one of the QM2's propellers. Usually these big boats avoid this kind of thing. In the "old days" tugs handled any close-in maneuvers. When handling sailboats, docking is a high stress moment, partly because a lot of people are watching! As for storms, they are normal and make the trip more interesting. **** QM2's luxurious 'nightmare' By Steve Kingstone BBC News, Rio de Janeiro Was this a calamity cruise, marred by incompetence and corporate arrogance? Or did passengers overstate the hardship of spending eight continuous days aboard the world's most luxurious liner? Even among paying customers opinion was sharply divided, as they emerged down the gangplank into the searing heat of Rio de Janeiro. "It was horrendous," gasped Pauline Berwick from Lancashire. "We couldn't get off the ship, and the weather was dreadful. It was too rough to go out on deck." Many passengers complained of a delay in being told about itinerary changes. "Had they given us the opportunity to get off in Florida, I would rather have gone home," explained an emotional Penny Freemantle. "I would rather have gone home than have gone through this nightmare." 'Whingeing poms' The "nightmare" entailed the cancellation of scheduled stops in St Kitts, Barbados and Salvador de Bahia in Brazil. This followed a close-encounter with a sea wall in Florida - a collision which damaged one of the QM2's propellers. Around 300 to 500 passengers were in a mutinous mood - they were threatening to have a sit-in in Rio and chain themselves to their beds Ted Staunton passenger But with a theatre, fitness centre and casino among the on-board attractions, some passengers felt their fellow travellers were being ungrateful. "They were whingeing poms," said Australian Terry Southerwood. "And there were a few whingeing Americans too." Quayside in Rio, one man showed off camcorder footage of the voyage. A revealing snippet showed angry passengers haranguing Commodore Ronald Warwick, the Master of the QM2. Rebellion in the air Bearded and besieged, the experienced Commodore Warwick did his best to apologise. Despite their many complaints, most departing passengers described him as "a very nice man". As far as everything else went, the trip was delightful But nonetheless, as the ship approached the Brazilian coast there was rebellion in the air. "Around 300 to 500 passengers were in a mutinous mood," explained Canadian cruiser Ted Staunton. "They were threatening to have a sit-in in Rio and chain themselves to their beds." In the end, the bed-post protest was averted when the ship's operator, Cunard Line, offered all departing passengers a full refund, including airfares home. That was an improvement on the initial offer of a 50% refund. "If they'd been smart they would have offered full refunds in the first place and got a lot of good PR," rued Jack Gulick from Princeton, New Jersey. "But as far as everything else went, the trip was delightful." Story from BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/h...as/4656562.stm |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
More on the QM2 rebellion
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
More on the QM2 rebellion
"Earl Evleth" wrote in message ... On 28/01/06 17:27, in article , "Martin" wrote: The QM2 has the props mounted on pods, among other reasons it is in order to avoid the need for the assistance of tugs etc. The apparently needed the tugs, time tested, you know. Or maybe you don't. :-) Shoddy French workmanship? JohnT |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
More on the QM2 rebellion
On 28/01/06 21:24, in article
, "JohnT" wrote: The apparently needed the tugs, time tested, you know. Or maybe you don't. :-) Shoddy French workmanship? Or maybe they use foreign personnel on the ship. One pod was ruined by running into a concrete pier, No ship is idiot proof. Take the word of an old sailor (first photo at http://homepage.mac.com/evleth/PhotoAlbum7.html) :-) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
More on the QM2 rebellion
"Earl Evleth" wrote in message ... On 28/01/06 21:24, in article , "JohnT" wrote: The apparently needed the tugs, time tested, you know. Or maybe you don't. :-) Shoddy French workmanship? Or maybe they use foreign personnel on the ship. One pod was ruined by running into a concrete pier, No ship is idiot proof. No but pods are by definition more susceptible to damage than screws which are under the stern of the ship. Most conventional ships can glance off a concrete pier or even run aground without wrecking the screws. Cunard went for a bold design and seem to be paying the price. Keith |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
More on the QM2 rebellion
What has this to do with Europe???
Once more evleth spams the group and martin entertains the thread. Once more he'll be whining "momma that naughty Runge is stalking me !" Once more martin will be advising him to plonk me. Of course, it seems that I'm the only one to be complaining, I suppose it's very anglo-saxon to enjoy such bad manners. evleth is a real pest. "Earl Evleth" a écrit dans le message de news: ... Aside from a spoiled passenger problem the technical incident was------ The "nightmare" entailed the cancellation of scheduled stops in St Kitts, Barbados and Salvador de Bahia in Brazil. This followed a close-encounter with a sea wall in Florida - a collision which damaged one of the QM2's propellers. Usually these big boats avoid this kind of thing. In the "old days" tugs handled any close-in maneuvers. When handling sailboats, docking is a high stress moment, partly because a lot of people are watching! As for storms, they are normal and make the trip more interesting. **** QM2's luxurious 'nightmare' By Steve Kingstone BBC News, Rio de Janeiro Was this a calamity cruise, marred by incompetence and corporate arrogance? Or did passengers overstate the hardship of spending eight continuous days aboard the world's most luxurious liner? Even among paying customers opinion was sharply divided, as they emerged down the gangplank into the searing heat of Rio de Janeiro. "It was horrendous," gasped Pauline Berwick from Lancashire. "We couldn't get off the ship, and the weather was dreadful. It was too rough to go out on deck." Many passengers complained of a delay in being told about itinerary changes. "Had they given us the opportunity to get off in Florida, I would rather have gone home," explained an emotional Penny Freemantle. "I would rather have gone home than have gone through this nightmare." 'Whingeing poms' The "nightmare" entailed the cancellation of scheduled stops in St Kitts, Barbados and Salvador de Bahia in Brazil. This followed a close-encounter with a sea wall in Florida - a collision which damaged one of the QM2's propellers. Around 300 to 500 passengers were in a mutinous mood - they were threatening to have a sit-in in Rio and chain themselves to their beds Ted Staunton passenger But with a theatre, fitness centre and casino among the on-board attractions, some passengers felt their fellow travellers were being ungrateful. "They were whingeing poms," said Australian Terry Southerwood. "And there were a few whingeing Americans too." Quayside in Rio, one man showed off camcorder footage of the voyage. A revealing snippet showed angry passengers haranguing Commodore Ronald Warwick, the Master of the QM2. Rebellion in the air Bearded and besieged, the experienced Commodore Warwick did his best to apologise. Despite their many complaints, most departing passengers described him as "a very nice man". As far as everything else went, the trip was delightful But nonetheless, as the ship approached the Brazilian coast there was rebellion in the air. "Around 300 to 500 passengers were in a mutinous mood," explained Canadian cruiser Ted Staunton. "They were threatening to have a sit-in in Rio and chain themselves to their beds." In the end, the bed-post protest was averted when the ship's operator, Cunard Line, offered all departing passengers a full refund, including airfares home. That was an improvement on the initial offer of a 50% refund. "If they'd been smart they would have offered full refunds in the first place and got a lot of good PR," rued Jack Gulick from Princeton, New Jersey. "But as far as everything else went, the trip was delightful." Story from BBC NEWS: http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/h...as/4656562.stm |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
More on the QM2 rebellion
and now the old family album so that everyone can see how a great man.evleth
is. Duuhhhh He also has a friend in Ghana, did you know that ?? Meanwhile let us forget about travelling in Europe "Earl Evleth" a écrit dans le message de news: ... On 28/01/06 21:24, in article , "JohnT" wrote: The apparently needed the tugs, time tested, you know. Or maybe you don't. :-) Shoddy French workmanship? Or maybe they use foreign personnel on the ship. One pod was ruined by running into a concrete pier, No ship is idiot proof. Take the word of an old sailor (first photo at http://homepage.mac.com/evleth/PhotoAlbum7.html) :-) |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
More on the QM2 rebellion
On 28/01/06 21:58, in article , "Keith
W" wrote: Cunard went for a bold design and seem to be paying the price. Maybe it was the crew? Most of these ships employ 3rd world crews which are constantly running down French fishing vessels in the Manche. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
More on the QM2 rebellion
"Earl Evleth" wrote in message ... On 28/01/06 21:24, in article , "JohnT" wrote: The apparently needed the tugs, time tested, you know. Or maybe you don't. :-) Shoddy French workmanship? Or maybe they use foreign personnel on the ship. One pod was ruined by running into a concrete pier, No ship is idiot proof. The QM2 was built in France. JohnT |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
More on the QM2 rebellion
"Earl Evleth" wrote in message ... On 28/01/06 21:58, in article , "Keith W" wrote: Cunard went for a bold design and seem to be paying the price. Maybe it was the crew? No the crew didnt choose to use Azipods Most of these ships employ 3rd world crews Not on the bridge they dont which are constantly running down French fishing vessels in the Manche. Feel free to list the number of French fishing vessels run down by Cunard cruise ships Keith |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|