If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1001
|
|||
|
|||
The Rev Gaston writes:
But if Sharon Stone's intellect was sufficient to compensate for her below-average looks, surely a towering intellect like your own must be adequate to compensate for the most grotesque deformity? What leads you to believe that I have a towering intellect? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#1002
|
|||
|
|||
DDT Filled Mormons writes:
Not at all. In fact the constant changes make you even more sensitive to the small changes whilst the big changes keep your view of the big picture in check. That is not what I've observed in such people. They consistently make poor decisions in almost every domain, since at any given time they can see only one viewpoint (their own) and this viewpoint swings wildly among various extremes. You don't see the correlation because you have no evidence of it. You have no evidence of it, cause you refuse to believe it exists. Not believing that something exists does not eliminate evidence of existence. If I have no evidence of it, that cannot be any consequence of my beliefs. No. In fact it greatly broadens the scope. Hardly. I've seen the constraints it places on male-female relationships. It must be a lonely world for people who accept those constraints. By limiting the actions you allow yourself, you are limiting your options. Which limitations am I placing on myself? Those who don't limit themselves have the broadest scope of all. Perhaps, but I'm closer to that ideal than most people are, since I don't see the opposite sex as merely a pool of mating partners. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#1003
|
|||
|
|||
DDT Filled Mormons writes:
So you don't work 55 hours per week, but about half of that. I spent about that time at the workplace. As such, you don't know what it's like to work 55 hours per week. Actually I do. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#1004
|
|||
|
|||
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) writes: And yet, according to your posts here, "being smart" hasn't achieved much for you! Where did I say I was smart? Where did she say you said you were smart? |
#1005
|
|||
|
|||
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... The Rev Gaston writes: But if Sharon Stone's intellect was sufficient to compensate for her below-average looks, surely a towering intellect like your own must be adequate to compensate for the most grotesque deformity? What leads you to believe that I have a towering intellect? Whooooosh! |
#1006
|
|||
|
|||
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... DDT Filled Mormons writes: So you don't work 55 hours per week, but about half of that. I spent about that time at the workplace. As such, you don't know what it's like to work 55 hours per week. Actually I do. Whoooooooooossshhh! |
#1007
|
|||
|
|||
No Spam writes:
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... EvelynVogtGamble(Divamanque) writes: And yet, according to your posts here, "being smart" hasn't achieved much for you! Where did I say I was smart? Where did she say you said you were smart? In the statement you just quoted: "'being smart' hasn't achieved much for you!" If I were not smart, this statement would make no sense. And since she says "according to your posts," she implies that at some point I claimed to be smart. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#1008
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:12:08 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:
DDT Filled Mormons writes: So you don't work 55 hours per week, but about half of that. I spent about that time at the workplace. As such, you don't know what it's like to work 55 hours per week. Actually I do. Do you work nights? -- Tim C. |
#1009
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:11:32 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:
Not believing that something exists does not eliminate evidence of existence. But it /can/ help you ignore such evidence, on the basis that it can#t be evidence because you believe it to be false. -- Tim C. |
#1010
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 05:11:32 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote:
Hardly. I've seen the constraints it places on male-female relationships. It must be a lonely world for people who accept those constraints. You should know. Mr Party Animal. -- Tim C. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rec.travel.europe FAQ | Yves Bellefeuille | Europe | 5 | January 21st, 2005 12:46 PM |
rec.travel.europe FAQ | Yves Bellefeuille | Europe | 0 | September 29th, 2004 05:19 AM |
rec.travel.europe FAQ | Yves Bellefeuille | Travel - anything else not covered | 0 | April 17th, 2004 12:28 PM |
Observer: Terror cells regroup - and now their target is Europe | Tam | Europe | 2 | January 13th, 2004 01:56 AM |
rec.travel.europe FAQ | Yves Bellefeuille | Europe | 0 | October 10th, 2003 09:44 AM |