If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Putting Air Travel Complaints in Context
In article ,
Tchiowa wrote: Haven't had a delay more than an hour except in Bangladesh. I encounter substantial delays on almost 1/4 of my flights, and looking at the on-time arrival statistics, my experience is typical. Yours isn't. Haven't had a cancelled flight in over a decade. I run into canceled flights (especially on commuter / express operations) at least twice a year. Hours-long takeoff delays due to airport and air route traffic jams Never. Maybe it's not busy in Bangladesh, but at an airport like EWR (and avoiding EWR is not an option, not for those of us who have to travel to New York), an hour-long takeoff wait is a routine occurrence. Once, AF diverted from Paris to Lyons. Try flying to a megahub like DFW when it gets hit by bad weather. But those system-wide problems are relatively rare. Most of the passenger complaints are around service, seat comfort, etc. I hardly ever hear complaints about service and seat comfort (except in coach on European airlines, where both service and comfort are worse than atrocious). What people do complain about is endless delays, which affect everybody equally - in economy or in business. I don't drink. But by arriving early, neither do I get stressed in the security line when there are 50 people ahead of me and my flight is leaving in 20 minutes. Use the elite line And I have seen many examples where the "last person to check in" didn't make through security and took the next flight. In years of 100K-miles-per-year flying, I was the last person on board dozens of times. I only missed one flight, and it wasn't a big deal: I just caught the next flight out. The usual nonsense advice to come to the airport 2 hours in advance has nothing to do with security lines (the only time I recall spending more than 20 minutes at a security checkpoint was in London after the bomb scare), but all to do with the desire of airport shops for a captive audience. I don't care for airport shops, airport lounges, or airport eateries. Ignoring this advice saved me hundreds of hours over the years to spend with my family or doing productive work in my office. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Putting Air Travel Complaints in Context
In article ,
Craig Welch wrote: BA is to be avoided. My recent experience with BA (flying business class, too): 5-hour delay in Heathrow, cabin heated up to a sauna-like temperature, and then, after arriving to JFK at 2 in the morning, learning that my baggage has been lost. The cause of the delay? Mechanical? Weather? Slots? Mechanical. Or so they told us. They lost your baggage? *Every* airline in the world loses baggage. Some more than others, but a sample of one is hardly sufficient to avoid an airline. Tell this to ``Tchiowa,'' who avoids Continental on the basis of a single domestic flight where they would not let him into a lounge or something. He even seems to have opinions about Continental's BusinessFirst, which he has never seen. Really, you've been in this group long enough 13 years and counting |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Putting Air Travel Complaints in Context
In message Binyamin Dissen
wrote: Is there much of a difference between a flight delayed past the time of the next flight or a cancelled flight? That all depends... If the combined number of passengers is less then the number of seats on the second flight, no. However, if that combined number of passengers is larger then the number of seats on the second flight, then yes, there is a noticeable difference between the two situations. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Putting Air Travel Complaints in Context
DevilsPGD wrote:
In message Binyamin Dissen wrote: Is there much of a difference between a flight delayed past the time of the next flight or a cancelled flight? That all depends... If the combined number of passengers is less then the number of seats on the second flight, no. However, if that combined number of passengers is larger then the number of seats on the second flight, then yes, there is a noticeable difference between the two situations. I had one situation when I flew WN from SJC to BUR. I had a meeting at a studio, and then plan to spend some time in the LA area, eventually flying out of SNA. I was traveling with a companion on a "Friends Fly Free (Buy 1 Get 1) Fare". All LA airports were fogged in and, after circling for awhile, we flew back to SJC in time for the next scheduled flight of the same plane, for SJC-BUR. Everyone was offered either a later flight, or compensation of $200 plus the cost of the value of the segment, if they would give up their seat. Optionally, they could stay on the flight. Since we were going to be too late for the event we had planned to attend, we chose to fly to LAX 45 minutes later. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Complaints about travel agents | chaliban | Europe | 2 | August 1st, 2006 07:27 PM |
Americans putting their feet up everywhere | The Reids | Europe | 0 | March 16th, 2005 03:43 PM |
Americans putting their feet up everywhere | Padraig Breathnach | Europe | 0 | March 15th, 2005 07:19 PM |
Americans putting their feet up everywhere | john | Europe | 0 | March 15th, 2005 05:35 AM |
Americans putting their feet up everywhere | Bert Hyman | Air travel | 0 | March 14th, 2005 03:27 PM |