If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Am you legally justified in killing a passenger who refuses to turn off their cell phone?
Shall not be infringed wrote in
: On Jan 18, 1:41*am, "Charles Dickey" wrote: I did some traveling lately and noted that some passengers who were told to turn off their phones, did so, and as soon as the stewardess passed on, they turned them right back on. *This is a safety precaution for all, and the deliberate refusal for the passengers to comply could have a fatal result for me. If I kill the asshole because I fear for my life, will this be considered an act of self defense? Discuss. Ummm. Probably not justified. Damn, someone who figured it out without a lot of hoopla. -- It's impossible to defeat an ignorant man in argument. William G McAdoo Sleep well, tonight..... RD (The Sandman) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Am you legally justified in killing a passenger who refuses toturn off their cell phone?
On Jan 20, 12:34*pm, RD Sandman
wrote: Shall not be infringed wrote : On Jan 18, 1:41*am, "Charles Dickey" wrote: I did some traveling lately and noted that some passengers who were told to turn off their phones, did so, and as soon as the stewardess passed on, they turned them right back on. *This is a safety precaution for all, and the deliberate refusal for the passengers to comply could have a fatal result for me. If I kill the asshole because I fear for my life, will this be considered an act of self defense? Discuss. Ummm. Probably not justified. Damn, someone who figured it out without a lot of hoopla. * But... what if they're actually calling the phone connected to a bad thing in their check bag? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Am you legally justified in killing a passenger who refuses to turn off their cell phone?
"Shall not be infringed" wrote in message ... On Jan 20, 12:34 pm, RD Sandman wrote: Shall not be infringed wrote : On Jan 18, 1:41 am, "Charles Dickey" wrote: I did some traveling lately and noted that some passengers who were told to turn off their phones, did so, and as soon as the stewardess passed on, they turned them right back on. This is a safety precaution for all, and the deliberate refusal for the passengers to comply could have a fatal result for me. If I kill the asshole because I fear for my life, will this be considered an act of self defense? Discuss. Ummm. Probably not justified. Damn, someone who figured it out without a lot of hoopla. But... what if they're actually calling the phone connected to a bad thing in their check bag? Good luck, since the aircraft skin and interior deck would provide a very effective faraday shield against any sort of radio transmission. Further cargo loaded on passenger aircraft is all pre-screened for explosives and thus it would be hard to get such a device in place. Further assuming a device is in place...why would you need to 'contact' it with your cell phone anyway? There is very little you can done from your phone that could be done remotely via timers and various types of sensors. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Am you legally justified in killing a passenger who refuses toturn off their cell phone?
On Jan 20, 6:41*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "Shall not be infringed" wrote in ... On Jan 20, 12:34 pm, RD Sandman wrote: Shall not be infringed wrote : On Jan 18, 1:41 am, "Charles Dickey" wrote: I did some traveling lately and noted that some passengers who were told to turn off their phones, did so, and as soon as the stewardess passed on, they turned them right back on. *This is a safety precaution for all, and the deliberate refusal for the passengers to comply could have a fatal result for me. If I kill the asshole because I fear for my life, will this be considered an act of self defense? Discuss. Ummm. Probably not justified. Damn, someone who figured it out without a lot of hoopla. * But... what if they're actually calling the phone connected to a bad thing in their check bag? Good luck, since the aircraft skin and interior deck would provide a very effective faraday shield against any sort of radio transmission. In theory. But my phone works quite well before we pull away from the gate. Further cargo loaded on passenger aircraft is all pre-screened for explosives and thus it would be hard to get such a device in place. Inside job. Further assuming a device is in place...why would you need to 'contact' it with your cell phone anyway? That's obvious. You wish to communicate with it. There is very little you can done from your phone that could be done remotely via timers and various types of sensors. Phone works, too. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Am you legally justified in killing a passenger who refuses to turn off their cell phone?
"Shall not be infringed" wrote in message ... On Jan 20, 6:41 pm, "Scout" wrote: "Shall not be infringed" wrote in ... On Jan 20, 12:34 pm, RD Sandman wrote: Shall not be infringed wrote : On Jan 18, 1:41 am, "Charles Dickey" wrote: I did some traveling lately and noted that some passengers who were told to turn off their phones, did so, and as soon as the stewardess passed on, they turned them right back on. This is a safety precaution for all, and the deliberate refusal for the passengers to comply could have a fatal result for me. If I kill the asshole because I fear for my life, will this be considered an act of self defense? Discuss. Ummm. Probably not justified. Damn, someone who figured it out without a lot of hoopla. But... what if they're actually calling the phone connected to a bad thing in their check bag? Good luck, since the aircraft skin and interior deck would provide a very effective faraday shield against any sort of radio transmission. In theory. But my phone works quite well before we pull away from the gate. Yep, but I bet you're not sitting in the cargo deck. There is a minor difference between the cargo deck and the passenger deck. Specifically windows. Further cargo loaded on passenger aircraft is all pre-screened for explosives and thus it would be hard to get such a device in place. Inside job. Doesn't matter, you still would have to get such a device through multiple levels of security, and so on. Further, if such a device could be planted, then wouldn't that be the person you would want to shoot.....not some idiot on a cell phone? Further assuming a device is in place...why would you need to 'contact' it with your cell phone anyway? That's obvious. You wish to communicate with it. To do what? Make it blow up? That's about the only communication you would need and as said that could be handled by the device itself given timers and a few sensors. There is very little you can done from your phone that could be done remotely via timers and various types of sensors. Phone works, too. Not into a cargo hold it doesn't. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Am you legally justified in killing a passenger who refuses toturn off their cell phone?
On Jan 20, 6:53*pm, "Scout"
wrote: "Shall not be infringed" wrote in ... On Jan 20, 6:41 pm, "Scout" wrote: "Shall not be infringed" wrote in ... On Jan 20, 12:34 pm, RD Sandman wrote: Shall not be infringed wrote : On Jan 18, 1:41 am, "Charles Dickey" wrote: I did some traveling lately and noted that some passengers who were told to turn off their phones, did so, and as soon as the stewardess passed on, they turned them right back on. *This is a safety precaution for all, and the deliberate refusal for the passengers to comply could have a fatal result for me. If I kill the asshole because I fear for my life, will this be considered an act of self defense? Discuss. Ummm. Probably not justified. Damn, someone who figured it out without a lot of hoopla. * But... what if they're actually calling the phone connected to a bad thing in their check bag? Good luck, since the aircraft skin and interior deck would provide a very effective faraday shield against any sort of radio transmission. In theory. *But my phone works quite well before we pull away from the gate. Yep, but I bet you're not sitting in the cargo deck. There is a minor difference between the cargo deck and the passenger deck.. Specifically windows. Good point. Further cargo loaded on passenger aircraft is all pre-screened for explosives and thus it would be hard to get such a device in place. Inside job. Doesn't matter, you still would have to get such a device through multiple levels of security, and so on. Further, if such a device could be planted, then wouldn't that be the person you would want to shoot.....not some idiot on a cell phone? Well of course, but the guy on the phone for GP. Further assuming a device is in place...why would you need to 'contact' it with your cell phone anyway? That's obvious. *You wish to communicate with it. To do what? Make it blow up? That's about the only communication you would need and as said that could be handled by the device itself given timers and a few sensors. There is very little you can done from your phone that could be done remotely via timers and various types of sensors. Phone works, too. Not into a cargo hold it doesn't. I don't know. Haven't been in the belly of a plane since the AF, and I didn't have a cell phone then. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Am you legally justified in killing a passenger who refuses toturn off their cell phone?
On Jan 20, 6:53*pm, "Scout"
wrote: Phone works, too. Not into a cargo hold it doesn't. Mil Handbook 419A covers grounding , bonding , and shielding pretty well. Read the chapter on screen rooms before making statements that cell phones will not work in a cargo hole. To keep out rf signals takes a lot of work. Dan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Am you legally justified in killing a passenger who refuses toturn off their cell phone?
On Jan 21, 1:40*pm, RD Sandman
wrote: Shall not be infringed wrote : On Jan 20, 12:34*pm, RD Sandman wrote: Shall not be infringed wrote innews:6702 : On Jan 18, 1:41*am, "Charles Dickey" wrote: I did some traveling lately and noted that some passengers who were told to turn off their phones, did so, and as soon as the stewardess passed on, they turned them right back on. *This is a safety precaution for all, and the deliberate refusal for the passengers to comply could have a fatal result for me. If I kill the asshole because I fear for my life, will this be considered an act of self defense? Discuss. Ummm. Probably not justified. Damn, someone who figured it out without a lot of hoopla. * But... what if they're actually calling the phone connected to a bad thing in their check bag? That happens so often that it is probably on the very edge of everyone's mind as they start that take off roll down the runway. * -- It's impossible to defeat an ignorant man in argument. William G McAdoo Sleep well, tonight..... RD (The Sandman) I'm just looking fore reason's for Charles to legally shoot the passenger on the phone. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Am you legally justified in killing a passenger who refuses to turn off their cell phone?
"Shall not be infringed" wrote in message
... But... what if they're actually calling the phone connected to a bad thing in their check bag? That happens so often that it is probably on the very edge of everyone's mind as they start that take off roll down the runway. [snip] I'm just looking fore reason's for Charles to legally shoot the passenger on the phone. -------------------------------------- Some people just need killing. Obnoxious, loud-mouth cell phone users on airplanes come to mind.... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Am you legally justified in killing a passenger who refuses to turn off their cell phone? | Gunner Asch[_2_] | Air travel | 36 | January 24th, 2012 08:33 AM |
Am you legally justified in killing a passenger who refuses toturn off their cell phone? | bill | Air travel | 6 | January 22nd, 2012 11:39 PM |
Am you legally justified in killing a passenger who refuses to turn off their cell phone? | Gunner Asch[_2_] | Air travel | 0 | January 20th, 2012 06:00 AM |