If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A380: The Dam Breaks...
FedEx Scraps Airbus A380 Order, to Buy 15 Boeing 777s (Update2)
By Mary Schlangenstein Nov. 7 (Bloomberg) -- FedEx Corp., the world's largest cargo airline, scrapped its order for the troubled Airbus A380 jumbo jet and said it would purchase 15 Boeing Co. 777 jets instead. It was the first cancellation of an A380 order. FedEx, working to meet international shipping demand, scrapped the 10-plane Airbus order after production troubles delayed planned deliveries from January 2009 into 2010. FedEx's new order for Boeing 777 freighters is the largest ever for the plane and carries a list value of as much as $3.6 billion. ``FedEx has made significant investments in our network to meet customers' needs and fulfill our business objectives,'' FedEx Chief Executive Officer Fred Smith said in a statement today. ``It was necessary and prudent for us to acquire the Boeing 777 freighter.'' FedEx's move is the latest reverse for Toulouse, France- based Airbus in its A380 program, which has been delayed three times in 16 months. Virgin Atlantic Airways Ltd. last month postponed its order for the double-decker jumbo jet after Airbus announced the latest delay. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A380: The Dam Breaks...
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A380: The Dam Breaks...
"Tchiowa" wrote:
FedEx Scraps Airbus A380 Order, to Buy 15 Boeing 777s (Update2) You've got to wonder if this isnt' indeed the beginning of much bigger cancellations. Certainly the UPS freighter order is now suspect. The real question is where the passenger orders will go. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
A380: The Dam Breaks...
Rick Blaine writes:
Certainly the UPS freighter order is now suspect. The real question is where the passenger orders will go. The 747 could be kept alive for quite some time. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
A380: The Dam Breaks...
Mxsmanic wrote:
The 747 could be kept alive for quite some time. And the 787, while smaller and requiring a change of service concept, looks to be a *very* nice plane indeed. Neil |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
A380: The Dam Breaks...
Mxsmanic wrote: Rick Blaine writes: Certainly the UPS freighter order is now suspect. The real question is where the passenger orders will go. The 747 could be kept alive for quite some time. As much as this might look like the beginning of the end, I suspect it is only a short term problem. Airbus can't afford to not deliver this plane and they will. They have relatively unlimited resources to ensure that the plane is delivered. Once it is, and they start rolling off an assembly line, as long as no serious latent problems are discovered, it becomes a more predictable aircraft to purchase and easier to sell. At that point the only question left will be whether there is a market for the plane. The 747 won't "replace" an A380. Neither will a 777 or a 787. The last two will compete and as such the question is whether the A380 is useful or not. That can't be answered now. But there is assuredly SOME market for such a large plane. The only question will be if it is big enough to justify the aircrafts costs. I suspect Airbus can keep the production going long enough for it to mature into the market well past the 747's ability to sell aircraft. The only thing that will kill the A380 is if the market is just too small. The current problems with the aircraft have little to do with that question. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
A380: The Dam Breaks...
the only question left will be whether there is a market for the plane.
The 747 won't "replace" an A380. Neither will a 777 or a 787. Funny you should mention that. The numbers I've seen say that the dead weight per passenger or per pound of cargo is much higher on a 380 than on a 777 or 747. On long routes like trans-Pacific, the 777 actually has a higher cargo capacity than a 380 because of all of the fuel that a 380 has to carry. R's, John |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
A380: The Dam Breaks...
John L writes:
Funny you should mention that. The numbers I've seen say that the dead weight per passenger or per pound of cargo is much higher on a 380 than on a 777 or 747. On long routes like trans-Pacific, the 777 actually has a higher cargo capacity than a 380 because of all of the fuel that a 380 has to carry. Yet another reason to buy Boeing. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cedar Breaks on May 22 | JP Peiren | USA & Canada | 2 | May 12th, 2006 02:38 PM |
QM2 Breaks Down | Linsifer | Cruises | 0 | April 15th, 2004 10:54 PM |
QM2 Breaks Down | SNUMBER6 | Cruises | 3 | April 15th, 2004 11:51 AM |
QM2 Breaks Down | Howie | Cruises | 6 | April 14th, 2004 06:34 AM |
QM2 Breaks Down | Benjamin Smith | Cruises | 8 | April 14th, 2004 01:04 AM |