Americans in Paris

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:54:29 +0000, Reid
wrote:

Following up to Deep Freud Moors

Where is the imminent threat that justified destroying the country?

even if they find WMD's tomorrow they clearly didnt know about
any at start of war and swiftly moved to the "butcher" argument
Go Fig has swallowed hook line and sinker.

He wants to believe so badly, to the point where reason is no longer
even necessary.
---
DFM

Mxsmanic wrote:
Miles writes:


There is a 100% certainty that the weapons did exist. That means there
is a 100% certainty that they still exist somewhere in some form or
another whether intact or destroyed.


If they have been destroyed, they no longer exist.

Not true. They exist in remnants that need to be found. I would like
proof of their destruction before blindly assuming such.

On Wed, 17 Dec 2003 06:21:06 -0700, Miles
wrote:



Mxsmanic wrote:
Miles writes:


There is a 100% certainty that the weapons did exist. That means there
is a 100% certainty that they still exist somewhere in some form or
another whether intact or destroyed.


If they have been destroyed, they no longer exist.

Not true. They exist in remnants that need to be found. I would like
proof of their destruction before blindly assuming such.
How can you Prove that something Doesn't exist? What?!
H
Retired Teacher, Terrible Mechanic, Worse Plumber!
LPFM Page: http://home.att.net/~optcamel/fmradio.htm

Howard N. Lute wrote:

How can you Prove that something Doesn't exist? What?!

What happens to your trash when you toss it out? Is it gone? It would
be very difficult to completely vaporize those weapons and leave no
trace at all.

Miles wrote:
Howard N. Lute wrote:
How can you Prove that something Doesn't exist? What?!

What happens to your trash when you toss it out? Is it gone? It would
be very difficult to completely vaporize those weapons and leave no
trace at all.

It also very quickly becomes near-impossible to prove that something was in
your trash.

miguel
--
Hundreds of travel photos from around the world: http://travel.u.nu/

Miguel Cruz wrote:

Miles wrote:

Howard N. Lute wrote:

How can you Prove that something Doesn't exist? What?!

What happens to your trash when you toss it out? Is it gone? It would
be very difficult to completely vaporize those weapons and leave no
trace at all.


It also very quickly becomes near-impossible to prove that something was in
your trash.

Oh I see. If remnants of weapons are found, someone else must have
planted them in Iraq. The conspiracy theories spewing already.

Miles wrote:
Miguel Cruz wrote:
Miles wrote:
Howard N. Lute wrote:
How can you Prove that something Doesn't exist? What?!

What happens to your trash when you toss it out? Is it gone? It would
be very difficult to completely vaporize those weapons and leave no
trace at all.

It also very quickly becomes near-impossible to prove that something was in
your trash.

Oh I see. If remnants of weapons are found, someone else must have
planted them in Iraq. The conspiracy theories spewing already.

Sorry, that's not what I meant at all.

If I throw something away, it is subjected to decomposition, salvage, and
other entropic forces that soon take it away from where I left it or change
its form.

miguel
--
Hundreds of travel photos from around the world: http://travel.u.nu/

Miguel Cruz wrote:
If I throw something away, it is subjected to decomposition, salvage, and
other entropic forces that soon take it away from where I left it or change
its form.

The remnants are still largly identifiable through forensics. Remnants
of weapons that have been destroyed would be identifiable.

Miles wrote:
Miguel Cruz wrote:
If I throw something away, it is subjected to decomposition, salvage, and
other entropic forces that soon take it away from where I left it or change
its form.

The remnants are still largly identifiable through forensics. Remnants
of weapons that have been destroyed would be identifiable.

Salvage.

miguel
--
Hundreds of travel photos from around the world: http://travel.u.nu/