Caribbean Princess review on Cruise Critic

Don't know if anyone else has noticed but the review by sonjasue1 has been
changed. The previously discussed offensive reference has been changed to
chew down.

Paul
--
Paul Hoffman
Burlington ON
or
"Nothing is so firmly believed as that which is least known" Montaigne

Paul Hoffman wrote:
Don't know if anyone else has noticed but the review by sonjasue1 has been
changed. The previously discussed offensive reference has been changed to
chew down.


I think it now says "bartered down"--which thankfully, prevents the
sound alike reference to the offensive term.

Karenell wrote:
I think it now says "bartered down"--which thankfully, prevents the
sound alike reference to the offensive term.

No, "chew" is still there.

In one paragraph it says "barter", in the next it says "chew."

Why the editor didn't just change it to "barter" to be consistent is a
mystery.

Warren

On 12 Jun 2006 15:39:32 -0700, Karenell wrote:

Paul Hoffman wrote:
Don't know if anyone else has noticed but the review by sonjasue1 has been
changed. The previously discussed offensive reference has been changed to
chew down.

I think it now says "bartered down"--which thankfully, prevents the
sound alike reference to the offensive term.

I prefer Grouper Down myself.
--
http://www.punkvoter.com/anim/anim-idiot.html

On 12 Jun 2006 20:56:58 -0700, Warren wrote:

Karenell wrote:
I think it now says "bartered down"--which thankfully, prevents the
sound alike reference to the offensive term.

No, "chew" is still there.

In one paragraph it says "barter", in the next it says "chew."

Why the editor didn't just change it to "barter" to be consistent is a
mystery.

Warren

The mystery is that anyone gives a ****.
--
http://www.punkvoter.com/anim/anim-idiot.html

Chrissy Cruiser wrote:
The mystery is that anyone gives a ****.

That comes as no surprise.

On 13 Jun 2006 06:03:27 -0700, Warren wrote:

Chrissy Cruiser wrote:
The mystery is that anyone gives a ****.

That comes as no surprise.

Surprises usually happen in dark, tight "quarters".
--
http://www.punkvoter.com/anim/anim-idiot.html

In article om,
Warren wrote:

No, "chew" is still there.

In one paragraph it says "barter", in the next it says "chew."

Why the editor didn't just change it to "barter" to be consistent is a
mystery.

I wrote back to Cruise Critic about the change they made not being
enough. Laura wrote back that she thought the change to "chew" was
sufficient. Unfortunatly that shows ignorance on her part as to what
was wrong to begin with. All I can say is the result reflects badly on
Cruise Critic.

--
Charles

Charles wrote:
Laura wrote back that she thought the change to "chew" was
sufficient.

I wrote directly to the editor. She replied back this morning that
she'd pass along my concerns. No change.

Warren

Charles wrote:

In article om,
Warren wrote:

No, "chew" is still there.

In one paragraph it says "barter", in the next it says "chew."

Why the editor didn't just change it to "barter" to be consistent is a
mystery.

I wrote back to Cruise Critic about the change they made not being
enough. Laura wrote back that she thought the change to "chew" was
sufficient. Unfortunatly that shows ignorance on her part as to what
was wrong to begin with. All I can say is the result reflects badly on
Cruise Critic.

--
Charles

Have you tried complaining on their board, or would they delete
anti-CC comments?

You might point them at this site (if they care):

http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/jew.html

Bill