If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Delta and JetBlue Kick Themselves in the Butt
March 8, 2010
Two Airlines Seek Relief From New Rule By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS JetBlue and Delta want temporary exemptions from a new government rule that will limit the time airline passengers can be held on the tarmac. They say delays caused by the closing of a main runway at Kennedy International Airport in New York could cost them millions in fines. The Department of Transportation's new rule, which goes into effect April 29, orders airlines to let passengers off planes delayed for three hours or face hefty fines. In December, 22 flights nationwide were delayed for more than three hours from gate to departure. The new rule could fine an airline $27,500 per passenger for that kind of delay. For an average Boeing 737 with a full load of passengers, the fine could be around $3.5 million. JetBlue and Delta are the biggest operators at Kennedy, which was among the worst airports in the nation for delays last year. One of its four runways closed for repairs on March 1, and the work is already causing delays. May is the first full month the new rule will be in effect, and is also the start of the peak travel season. The airlines have already cut their schedules by about 10 percent at Kennedy to help ease delays until the runway reopens in July. "Although JetBlue has already taken several steps to minimize the impact of this closure on its J.F.K. operations, this exemption is necessary to ensure that JetBlue is not penalized if J.F.K. becomes gridlocked at peak operating times," the airline said in its request to the Transportation Department. Construction and other disruptions at a major airport often have a ripple effect because pilots, flight attendants and airplanes are delayed getting to other cities. "One late flight may delay three additional flights if the resources connect differently, and two or more late flights may delay several more flights," JetBlue said. Major cities that are most effected by delays at Kennedy are Los Angeles, San Francisco and Orlando, Fla. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Delta and JetBlue Kick Themselves in the Butt
In "Sancho Panza"
wrote: Two Airlines Seek Relief From New Rule How have they kicked themselves in the butt? Apparently, some airlines simply intend to cancel flights that might be delayed, which will get them off the hook so far as this new regulation is concerned, but certainly won't do their customers any good. -- Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Delta and JetBlue Kick Themselves in the Butt
In Bert Hyman
wrote: Apparently, some airlines simply intend to cancel flights that might be delayed, which will get them off the hook so far as this new regulation is concerned, but certainly won't do their customers any good. Several airlines, including Fort Worth-based American and Houston-based Continental, say they will cancel flights rather than risk paying stiff penalties for delaying passengers on the runway. Continental's CEO told investors Tuesday that the airline will opt to cancel flights rather than chance being fined. Aviation consultant Denny Kelly expects other airlines to follow suit. http://www.nbcdfw.com/news/local-bea...-87181947.html http://tinyurl.com/ydtkfj2 -- Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Delta and JetBlue Kick Themselves in the Butt
"Bert Hyman" wrote in message .. . In "Sancho Panza" wrote: Two Airlines Seek Relief From New Rule How have they kicked themselves in the butt? By making it clear that they expect major delays but dispute the penalty payments. Their customers who have a choice are likely to opt for alternatives. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Delta and JetBlue Kick Themselves in the Butt
In "Sancho Panza"
wrote: "Bert Hyman" wrote in message .. . In "Sancho Panza" wrote: Two Airlines Seek Relief From New Rule How have they kicked themselves in the butt? By making it clear that they expect major delays but dispute the penalty payments. Their customers who have a choice are likely to opt for alternatives. Do you think that they're unique in expecting delays, or just unique in saying that they expect delays? Should someone who chose another airline expect anything different? Would they be better off with American or Continental, who've already announced that they'll simply cancel any flights that might be delayed in order to avoid any possible fines? -- Bert Hyman St. Paul, MN |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Delta and JetBlue Kick Themselves in the Butt
Their customers who have a choice are likely to opt for alternatives. So you live in Manhattan and need to get to Rio? Budapest? Atlanta? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Delta and JetBlue Kick Themselves in the Butt
Bert Hyman wrote:
In "Sancho Panza" wrote: Two Airlines Seek Relief From New Rule How have they kicked themselves in the butt? Apparently, some airlines simply intend to cancel flights that might be delayed, which will get them off the hook so far as this new regulation is concerned, but certainly won't do their customers any good. Remember, it's three hours they have to get the plane off the ground! They _should_ just cancel the flight if they are so inept that they are loading up planes when they know that there are likely going to be delays. The airlines are just whining. They don't really want to cancel a flight and deal with refunds and rebookings, they just don't like dealing with the logistics of complying with that rule--it's inconvenient. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rugby World Cup ready for big kick-off | Jugdish | Europe | 3 | September 8th, 2007 09:16 AM |
Budget travel : Travel by butt-kick! | Tom-Alex Soorhull | Backpacking and Budget travel | 1 | May 18th, 2004 11:01 PM |